While reviewing this article, I had a basic question...
Why have the "export"?
As I recall my basic java accessor keywords which are either public, protected, private, or <no accessor>.
In the context of superpackages, usage of "export" seems to be the equivalent of having a public method in basic packaging, while the superpackage "public" methods seem to be the equivalent of protected method that is suppose to be acceptable within a package but not outside. Is this kind of repetitive and adding something that is already present? |
java.net RSS Feeds
